Thucydides vs. Plato - 1598 Words

Paper about Thucydides versus Plato on the nature of the Good Life 1: Thucydides versus Plato on the nature of the Good Life. Some have claimed that Thucydides is making empirical claims, whereas Plato is making normative claims. Is that true? Support your answer in your paper. Plato and Thucydides together had strikingly dissimilar views on their tactic on the good life. Many have demanded that Plato is making normative rights, whereas Thucydides has made empirical claims. Lets first take a look at Plato. Platos philosophy on the decent life was based on the confidence that all has an objective or use that is classically suited for asset, beauty, fairness, and excellence of the exact thing, and all will depend on the conclusion†¦show more content†¦Such an account we find chiefly in the Rules and Phaedrus, nonetheless also indirectly in the Timeous. On the additional hand, in hominid beings the depth is also distinctly moral, a self-ruler that systematizes its needs so that it can truly love understanding. The rank of Platos rights and arg umentation about individuals with incapacities is that this argumentation quantities to a justification founded upon a logical logos or reasoned quarrel rather than through a plea to mythos or approximately other socially built cultural objects. 2: Write a 750-word paper on the biblical view of science, technology, and the business world. Back up your conclusions with examples from your reading. How do you think the eighteenth-century world that gave rise to the Utilitarian reacted to the biblical view? The marvels of contemporary science are overwhelming to see and to use. This very episode is only likely by the processer and the Internet, surely two of the utmost creations of the 20th Century. There is no discipline or technology that inside itself is also bad or decent (moral or ethical). The discipline of the atom can be rummage-sale to generate power for thousands of people or it can be rummage-sale to kill and mutilate thousands in a horrifying way. The science of smallpox can eliminate it after existence or unleash scar and death. The automobile stretches great liberty to people around the biosphere, nonetheless also kills tens of thousands and hurts far more.Show MoreRelatedThucydides vs Plato Essay773 Words   |  4 PagesThucydides versus Plato Thucydides versus Plato on the nature of the Good Life Plato and Thucydides both had strikingly different views on their approach on the good life. Some have claimed that Plato is making normative claims, whereas Thucydides is making empirical claims. Lets start by taking a look at Plato. Platos theory on the good life was based on the belief that everything has an objective or use that is typically suited for virtue, beauty, justice, and excellence of the preciseRead MoreEssay about Thucydides vs Plato2008 Words   |  9 PagesCompare and contrast Thucydides’ and Socrates’ analyses of the fate of Athenian democracy in war, of why the Athenians went to war, and of how and why they failed. The Peloponnesian War was the turning point in Athenian hegemony in Ancient Greece. It was fought in 431 B.C. between the Delian League, led by Athens, and the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta. According to Thucydides, Athens’ imposing hegemonic status and its overwhelming quest for more power made the Peloponnesian War and Athens’sRead MoreThucydide vs Plato on The Good Life Essay1927 Words   |  8 Pagesï » ¿ Thucydides Versus Plato: Differing Views of the Good Life What is the true nature of the Good Life? Is it living life with concern for only oneself despite the possible consequences of ones action on others? Or might it involve self-sacrifice in effort to do what one feels is right or just? Is it descriptive, or perhaps prescriptive? Two prominent Greeks, Thucydides and Plato, began providing answers to these questions over 25 centuries ago as they analyzed and wrote critically aboutRead MoreA Biblical View of Science, Technology, and Business: Do Utilitarian’s Agree with These Biblical Views?1835 Words   |  8 PagesEducation Inc., 2004. Print. Thucydides’ Vs. Plato: The Good Life Two prominent Greeks, Thucydides and Plato analyzed and wrote critically about the ethical implications of life. Both philosophers had very differing perspectives on the nature of the Good Life. Some people believe that Thucydides made empirical claims, whereas others believe that Plato made normative claims. Each individual stated their own opinion on how one can achieve the Good Life. Thucydides, a general of the Athenian armyRead More Aristotelian Ethics and its Context Essay6933 Words   |  28 Pagesthe navy. These experienced men, it must not be forgotten, were free to attend Assembly meetings at any time, whether in or out of office. At least half the Athenian multitude deciding from ignorance on matters of state, a favorite target of Thucydides and Plato and many modern historians, thus melts away on close examination. . . (74-75). [W]e must concentrate our minds and our imaginations on a political system without modern parallels: there were no structured political parties and there was